Band concert at my daughter’s school; her friend begged her to come, and we sneak in the back a little late. Parents, grandparents in rows, siblings and cousins here and there. I’m dressed up for the occasion, and warm from working in the sun. Perspiration gathers against the back of my chair. I scan for a familiar face, an interesting face–see parents of a horse riding friend, a church acquaintance, a neighbor with whom I lost touch, and her boys are so grown. A father with his son whom in this world would be termed special needs, since he claps at the wrong time and seems excessively cheerful. An extrovert business acquaintance glad handing along the rows of chairs.
After the sixth graders perform, the main lights go down down and the spotlights shine on the bright heads of the next performers in their white shirts. The music honks along, not soaring, but demonstrating substantial accomplishment of youth under the tutelage of their band teacher. Her strong, black clad back is to us as she conducts, bright blonde hair recently coiffed for the occasion. I close my eyes. At the close of each song there’s enthusiastic applause, with elements of pride and relief.
Between songs the band teacher jokes, “If any of those kids are making noise in the front, just let me know and I’ll dock their grades.” Teacher power. Supposed to be funny, and some people laugh. I tense. The power of a teacher to grade being no joking matter, in my opinion, but to be treated with honesty and humility, and a certain disdain because of its disproportionate influence on young people.
In the middle school I attended in the late 1970s, teachers gave out what was called a “class mark,” a score out of ten for very subjective considerations, the main one being paying quiet attention to the teacher. I was a tiny rural fish in a big suburban pond–a school that took a forty-five minute bus ride to get to. In the shuffle of names slotted into streamed classes, I’d been separated from every single fellow elementary school friend and acquaintance I’d ever had. Yet in my home room, sitting right in front of me was a boy with a huge smile and a great sense of humor, and I was experiencing the joy of making a friend. Listening to the drone to the teacher came second to exchanging stories, comments, jokes, drawings, even mutual help with schoolwork. We both got low class marks, which I suppose was meant to pull us back in line. Instead it gave me a further disregard for grading and a priority on personal learning that I give as partial excuse for my inconsistent grades in later years. After all, I could master the class material in my spare time, doing homework on the long bus ride.
By the time I was a teacher in my first messy year, teaching 7th-9th grade science and French, I was using the onl grading system I knew tests, homework, and a “participation” score worth 10%. My professional practice was fledgling, the biggest challenge being managing large classes where meaningful connections with students took a backseat to survival, and my grasp of best practices in grading and assessment was minimal. I was grading homework with lots of supportive comments but too-strict criteria, most test grades were coming out low, and with a lot of challenges to my authority and disrespect for me as a teacher, rooted in my fumbling rookie efforts and the no mercy, no grace response of a majority of the students, I was awarding very few student with decent “participation” scores. Report cards came out, and both students and parents were complaining.
My principal was wise. Probably he remembered with humility his own early days of teaching, and he took me aside to help me with of my learning curve while managing things with parents, whose kids had been getting all A’s with the sub that had taught the first month before I got the job, being more fluent n French and a science grad to boot. He pointed out that one must be careful with subjective scores, and suggested I reduce the participation score to 5%. He got me a sub, gave me in-school work time, and got me some guidance in creating a fairer scoring scheme. The grades I came up with were more acceptable to students and parents, but still somewhat arbitrary, I see now. I learned a lot that year, and in successive years developed a much more valid, nuanced, and clearly communicated grading scheme–one which rested on the much more important process of diagnostic assessment and responsive, standards-based instruction. Not that I hold the standards to be the most important aspect of my teaching–it’s just the part tied to grading and accountability. But that’s in my other posts on the art of teaching. Art and science being partners, and the former being the spiritual head of that marriage…
I had all this power wrongly located in a flawed grading scheme. I was reminded of the wrongness of this by that grades-docking comment during my daughter’s concert night. Teacher power. What is it? Of what use is it? What constitutes its proper use?
Certain types of teachers exude a sense of authority. Or try to fake it, especially during unstructured time where there are no chairs to tell students to sit down in or tests to write, namely assemblies, lunch times and such. So similar to the posturing of ducks or pack dogs in attempts to be the alpha or chosen few of the alpha. I remember a certain teacher education classmate who had that stamp–not the stamp of principal as in natural visionary, leader, someone you want to work for, but a certain strut, desire to be liked, seen as boss, and a lack of interest in students as people or learners. Students were to complain and laugh about behind their backs over a cigarette, weekends were for tying one on. He came into the teacher education program, I suppose, as a man approaching middle age but adrift, seeing the opportunity to accredit and certify himself into a position leadership in some small town and be admired by the parents and younger teachers. To earn a decent salary with summers off and a nice office with a door that closes. There are schools everywhere–an open field.
At my school now, the principal’s door is open. She tells us we are all needed in our diversity, all important, all gifted and hard working. She needs us to, as she puts it “help her see the back of her hair,” to push back, say no, question her, bring ideas, do our thing. She invites us to lead, to head up what’s important to us, to work together, to get things done with or without her. She’s strong willed, brave, confident, adventurous, but with a kind, tender heart. Good with the students–they named her Teacher of the Year last year, before she was principal, and now she wants to teach still, but the central office says no, there are more important things to do.